HILLS Lab

Context infrastructure for software teams using AI.

We connect repositories, tickets, incidents, docs, and team decisions into a context layer that is current, verifiable, and permission-aware.

Focus

Reliable context before autonomy.

Context audits for existing engineering workflows

Repo, ticket, incident, and team memory

Permission-aware connectors for GitHub, Linear/Jira, Slack, Sentry, and docs

Evals that measure fewer wrong assumptions and safer code changes

View engagement model

Use cases

Where AI context pays off first.

AI readiness audit

Review existing repositories, tickets, docs, and operating rules before wider AI adoption.

Agent-safe knowledge base

Context from GitHub, Jira/Linear, Slack, and docs with source, scope, freshness, and ownership.

Coding assistant guardrails

Repo instructions, read/write boundaries, review rules, and traces that reduce wrong AI assumptions.

Incident and runbook context

Clean up runbooks, deploy rules, and incident knowledge that agents should not guess.

Recommendations

Proof from teams we have built with.

Povio, ReneVerse, and Tilt are HILLS Lab work. The other recommendations show the wider engineering track record behind HILLS Lab.

Wider engineering track record

Ericsson Nikola Tesla Founder track record
Curious, proactive, and willing to take responsibility beyond his role early in his career.
Ivica Vidovic Senior Software Engineering Manager, Head of UDM Operations at Ericsson Nikola Tesla; currently board member at Abysalto
Profico Founder track record
Someone we could truly rely on, not afraid to take responsibility and push new initiatives forward.
Rimac Automobili Founder track record
An exceptionally capable engineer whose code was built to last in a highly challenging hypercar telemetry and OTA domain.
Denis Grahovac Engineering Manager at Rimac then; now Director of Software Engineering at Toming

Thesis

Models change. Context remains the work.

The team advantage is not which tool wins this quarter. It is whether the system around the model knows what is true, current, allowed, relevant, and source-backed.

Engagement model

A small pilot before a large promise.

01

Discovery

One conversation and a short review of tools, teams, repositories, and where context breaks today.

02

Context audit

We map sources, permissions, stale context, ownership, and risk for one concrete workflow.

03

Pilot

We harden one repository, team, or agent workflow so the result can be tested in practice.

04

Rollout plan

You get recommendations, priorities, and a clear decision on implementation or retainer work.

Six checks before the answer

A context layer is not an archive. It has to decide what an agent is allowed to use before the model writes, changes, or recommends anything.

01

Source

Which repo, ticket, incident, document, or decision supports the claim.

02

Freshness

Whether the information is still current or a newer record has replaced it.

03

Permission

Whether this context is allowed for this team, tool, actor, and task.

04

Risk

What could break production, leak data, or lead the agent to a wrong conclusion.

05

Change

What changed since the last run, deploy, incident, or recorded decision.

06

Trace

Whether a person can replay the path: sources, permissions, decision, and result.

PLAYGRND proof point

An AI-assisted product where context has to be verifiable.

We build PLAYGRND as a public record for amateur football: SSR web, private Go API, Postgres/Redis, WhatsApp magic links, claim/correction loops, and derived season aggregates. It is the same pattern we bring to teams: fast public reads, controlled writes, clear sources, and human confirmation before AI changes an official record.

For local software teams

For local software teams

Local companies rarely need a generic AI demo. They need AI workflows that respect existing repos, clients, documentation, permissions, and production risk without adding another layer of chaos.

Notes

Working notes from practice.

Short notes on failure modes, context rules, memory diffs, and evals for teams bringing AI into daily software work.

Read notes